WHAT CAUSES THIS?
Why it breaks in production
Happy-path demos hide partial failure and retry semantics.
- Long-running work loses context or credentials.
- Side effects are not idempotent.
- Nobody owns the exception queue when confidence is low.
problem_kicker
A workflow that succeeds while an engineer watches the demo is not yet automation. Daily operation means missing inputs, expired credentials, changed APIs, ambiguous cases, retries and partial side effects must be expected rather than treated as surprises.
DEMAND LANGUAGE / REAL-WORLD PROBLEM
“The demo works. Will it still run every day when nobody is watching?”
“What happens when data is missing, an API is down or a run stops halfway?”
WHAT CAUSES THIS?
Happy-path demos hide partial failure and retry semantics.
architecture_for RELIABLE UNATTENDED AI WORKFLOWS
We design the failure path before scaling the happy path. Every durable step has explicit state, retry policy, timeout, ownership and observable post-condition.
Credentials are scoped to the step and lifetime required. Approval gates are attached to consequences, not to arbitrary model confidence thresholds.
Throughput, queue age, retry amplification and human intervention rate matter more than a single model response time.
AI workflows · agents · orchestration · observability
failure_kicker
measure_kicker
verify_intro
CTO / CIO FAQ
As autonomous as the consequences and verification allow. Irreversible or ambiguous actions may still need approval.
The workflow should preserve durable state, apply bounded retries and resume or escalate without duplicating side effects.
Run failure injection, replay and soak tests against realistic workloads and dependencies.
connected